Stole
| Title | Stole |
|---|---|
| Date | second half of 17th century 17th century |
| Medium | Needle lace, gros point lace, silk lining |
| Classification | Textiles-Laces |
| Holding institution | The Metropolitan Museum of Art |
| Credit line | Frederick C. Hewitt Fund, 1910 |
| Rights | Public domain (CC0). Free to use for any purpose. |
About this artwork
“Stole” is a work of unattributed authorship, dated second half of 17th century. It is executed in needle lace, gros point lace, silk lining and classified as textiles-laces. In this archive it sits within the botanical illustration tradition. This work is in the public domain (CC0), so the image may be downloaded and reused for any purpose without permission (see the licence note below).
Explore the context
The period
Dated to second half of 17th century. Explore the wider set of works from the 17th century held in the archive.
The collection
Made available through the The Metropolitan Museum of Art open-access programme, which explicitly places this work in the public domain.
Keep exploring
More in this tradition
- Plate Another botanical illustration plate
- Flowers (Fleurs) Another botanical illustration plate
- Birds and Flowers Another botanical illustration plate
- Beaker Depicting Rows of Figures Holdings Staffs or Plants with Geometric Motifs Another botanical illustration plate
- Frame for oil and vinegar Another botanical illustration plate
- Self-Portrait Another botanical illustration plate
- Print Another botanical illustration plate
- Breadth Another botanical illustration plate
The wider subject
- Botanical illustration ThemeThe history of botanical illustration, illustrated
Zoom out
- /browse Browse the whole archive
Download this image
Rights: Public Domain — released under Creative Commons Zero (CC0) via The Met Open Access.
This work is in the public domain. You may download the image and use it for any purpose, personal or commercial, without permission or payment. No attribution is legally required, though a credit to The Metropolitan Museum of Art is appreciated.
Prefer a themed set as a single ZIP with a manifest? See the image packs. The works remain public domain / CC0 whichever way you take them.
US vs EU note: in the United States a faithful photographic reproduction of a public-domain 2-D artwork carries no new copyright (Bridgeman v. Corel), which is the basis of these open-access programmes. EU Directive 2019/790 Art. 14 similarly provides that reproductions of public-domain visual works are not protected. If reusing commercially in another jurisdiction, satisfy yourself of the local position. See the full licence note.